Today I was very saddened (as I have been saddened all week) to learn of the violence that has, once again, broken out between the Israeli Defense Forces and (what is left of) the Palestinian Authority. As a citizen of a country that supports the IDF and the Israeli government as a whole, and as a believer in Christ, I find the events of the past 7 years in the Middle East . . . nothing short of appalling.
Personally, I blame Arafat for getting this slide into chaos started. He had an opportunity to accept a peace compromise with Israel that would have secured the future of his people for all time, and he pissed it all away for a stretch of land that anyone who believes in Christ knows to be absolutely meaningless: the Temple Mount. Let me be blunt here: even if the Israelis were to somehow reconstruct the ancient Temple of Solomon, and even if they were able to annex all of the rest of Jerusalem, it would all be for nothing. And why? Because "God does not dwell in temples made by human hands" but instead dwells in the body of believers via the Holy Spirit.
Arafat had things going for him--he had the world in his back pocket--and he threw it all away on some meaningless agenda. And now human lives are being taken, and have been taken for the past 6 or 7 years, and for what? Can any reader of this blog say to me for certain that what these two armies are fighting for is worth one human life, let alone the thousands that have been extinguished in the current Israeli/Palestinian hostilities?
Arafat, however, is not the only one I blame (yes, Sharon had a hand in what went on, but to me, he always seemed more of an opportunist who took advantage of the situation to make things worse--and besides, we all know he wasn't a peacemaker). No, while Arafat did, through his egotism, begin a cycle of violence that continues (and grows worse) to this day, a larger villain has been orchestrating the demise of peace in the Middle East.
That villain . . . is dispensational Christianity.
I used to be a dispensational Christian. I used to believe in the whole "seven year tribulation/rebuild the temple and rapture the world" point of view regarding eschatology, but the more I read the book of Revelation--indeed, the more I read the Bible, the less it makes sense. I won't even get into the fact that Matthew 24, Daniel 9, and Revelation 13 promise only 3 and a half years of tribulation (before the coming of the Lord). I won't mention that the Bible does not guarantee a rapture of believers in Christ before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes, and that the very fact that this has been an issue of such hot controversy among Christians should indicate how fragile the ground on which any eschatologist can make claims regarding the rapture (or any other aspect of the end times) really is. And I won't mention that in the days before Jesus came the first time, there were a great many divergent theories about who the messiah would be and how he would come to Israel--and that, God and humanity not having changed very much during the past 2000 years, it is highly unlikely that Christ's second coming will be any more "predictable".
No, what I intend to focus on in my remarks is the utter lack of regard that dispensational Christianity seems to have for the degree of human suffering in the Middle East. It seems as though the Crusades have been re-inaugurated. Iraq has become, like the Kingdom of Jerusalem was for the medieval Crusaders, our "kingdom of heaven," and the people who live there, the people whose lives were turned upside down by our support of Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War (which, by the way, he started), our war against Iraq in 1991 (motivated by our protection of the oil that Kuwait and Saudi Arabia had been sending us), a decade of sanctions against Hussein (which only resulted in his rule of Iraq becoming more brutal), and our wanton destruction of Iraq's infrastructure in 2003 (on, it seems, trumped up charges issued against Hussein) . . . those everyday people, those men, women, and children got lost somewhere in dispensational Christianity's zeal for the times of the end to come.
Thankfully, the human equation in Iraq seems to have resurfaced in the national consciousness, and the people of Iraq--the everyday men and women and families of a nation torn apart by our decades of selfish policies--seem to have registered in the minds and conversations of conservative Christians.
Sadly, the same cannot be said for the Palestinians.
Or the Israelis, for that matter.
I wonder, would it surprise my readers to know that much of Israeli culture is secular, not religious? To be sure, there is a religious culture in Israel as well, but it is not the dominant culture--in fact, the religious parties in Israel constitute a small minority in the Knesset (Israel's parliament). They allied with Sharon's Likud party for a time, but the agenda of Likud is definitely far more territorial and nationalistic than "eternal". Israeli society, from what I've seen, is quite Westernized, although there is much about European culture that feeds into Israeli society (then again, European culture over the past 2 centuries has been largely secular as well). It is hard for me to believe, as strongly as I believe in Jesus Christ, that my Israeli brothers and sisters would see Christianity as any more threatening (or valid) than any other belief system, though (considering Jewish history), they might be more inclined to see Christianity as a cultural and national source of pain more than anything else.
And what about the Palestinians? I wonder if my readers would be surprised to know how diverse the Palestinian people are in belief, in outlook, and (yes) in religious sensibilities. Among the Palestinians, there are Muslims, Druse . . . and a large population of Christians--and also (in many, and I'd say most cases) a great many people who see themselves coexisting with Israel or at least responding nonviolently to the IDF and the government it represents. The reason why groups like the PLO and Hamas were (and are) so popular with the Palestinians is the same reason why groups like Sinn Fein received support among the people of Northern Ireland: Losing your homeland and being forced to move and live under an occupying regime is not something human beings enjoy.
I've heard the whole line about Israelis only going after "perpetrators" with their eye-for-an-eye policy--but I don't believe it. So many Palestinian children have died during their various intifadah's (yes, I've kept track) that I doubt very seriously the resolve of a structure built by people who look back to the book of Joshua as their model for how to conduct business with other nations to spare the innocent. The fact is, ladies and gentlemen, that those "evil" Palestinians have a legitimate complaint--they were driven off their land (and told by the world to like it), forced to choose between Israeli rule and life in a refugee camp, and (after the Jordanian Civil War) barred from other nations in the region.
They
have
nothing.
And yet . . . they are utterly ignored in the conversations of dispensational Christians--as are their Israeli neighbors.
And the blood continues to seep into the ground, calling out to the God who, I believe, would have us answer the same question Cain once asked of the Lord: "Am I my brother's keeper?"